Wednesday, October 08, 2008

BEFORE THE LONELY VILLA (Pordenone 2008)


Le Médecin du château / The Physician of the Castle (FR 1908). A screenshot of my internet search view.
 
Before The Lonely Villa: tracking down the origins of the telephone thriller and alternating editing and crosscutting / parallel editing.
E-subtitles in Italian, grand piano: Stephen Horne, viewed at Le Giornate del Cinema Muto, Pordenone, Cinema Verdi, 8 October 2008.

The Lonely Villa. US 1909. PC: Biograph. D: D. W. Griffith; DP: G. W. Bitzer, Arthur Marvin; cast: David Miles (husband), Marion Leonard (wife), Mary Pickford (daughter), Gladys Egan, Adele De Garde, Owen Moore, Mack Sennett; 850 ft /16 fps/ 14 min; print: LoC. - Tom Gunning: "Mr. Cullison has responded to a false note telling him to meet his mother-in-law at the train station, and left his wife and daughters alone in their large country house. The note was sent by a gang of thieves to draw him out, and they have proceeded to burglarize the villa. The wife and daughters hear unexplained noises and discover the attempt to break into the house. At that very moment, the husband calls to say he has car trouble and learns of their plight. As he speaks to his wife, the burglars cut the telephone wires. Desperate, the husband enlists the aid of a policeman and, his car still out of commission, commandeers a gypsy wagon for a race to the rescue. Meanwhile, the burglars have broached the doorway and penetrated into the various rooms of the villa, and burst through the doors the wife has barricaded. They clear the last obstacle and are snatching the pearl necklace from Mrs. Cullison’s throat when the father arrives with the policeman and the family is saved." – Tom Gunning [DWG Project # 150]. - A brilliant image, no titles in this print.

Le Médecin du château / Der Arzt des Schlosses / The Physician of the Castle [GB] / A Narrow Escape [US]) / Врач замка. FR 1908. PC: Pathé. D: ?; 367 ft /16 fps/ 6 min; print source: BFINA / Josef Joye Collection. Deutsche Titel (in the beginning?), English titles (in the end?). - Not a top print but from a source with a good definition of light. - Henri Bousquet: "Dr. Amy is unexpectedly called to the castle by a message delivered by an unknown person. No sooner has he left than two thieves break into his house. The doctor’s wife seeks refuge in the study; from there she calls her husband by telephone. She piles some furniture against the door, well knowing that this will only briefly keep out the malefactors. But on receiving the call the doctor has leapt into his car and returns home at full speed. On the way he meets two game-keepers and takes them along with him. They arrive just as the two bandits enter the office. After a brief struggle they capture the two villains.” – Henri Bousquet (Catalogue Pathé)

Terrible angoisse. FR 1906. PC: Pathé. D: Lucien Nonguet; 78 m /16 fps/ 4 min; print: AFF/CNC. - (Pathé catalogue supplement, March 1906): “A brilliant lawyer, on holiday, is suddenly called to the Palace of Justice. During his absence, burglars break into the house and the lawyer’s wife has only time to run to the telephone to call her husband. While she is telling him about the presence of the malefactors, they leap at her throat and strangle her, together with her little son. Hearing nothing from the other end of the phone line, the unhappy lawyer guesses what is happening, and, crazed with grief, rushes home; he throws himself upon the corpses of his beloved spouse and his child.” (Pathé catalogue supplement, March 1906). - AA: a soft image in this print (digimastered?).

The Watermelon Patch. US 1905. PC: Edison. D: Edwin S. Porter, Wallace McCutcheon [Sr.? Jr.?]; cast: Florence Auer?; 35 mm, ?? ft., ?’ (16 fps); fonte copia/print source: Museum of Modern Art, New York. No intertitles. - André Gaudreault, Philippe Gauthier: "The Watermelon Patch contains one of the rare prototypes of cross-cutting (in early cinema). The film’s storyline can be summarized as follows: two whites chase a small group of blacks caught stealing watermelons from a field. The film’s action is so convoluted, and its narrative secondary to attraction to such a degree, that it is not easy to identify the alternating structure present in it. But this structure truly is present in the film, even if it is far from jumping out at us. Alternating editing is a discursive configuration whose minimal form is the recurrence of each term in two series. In other words, it is impossible to speak of alternating editing when only one of the terms recurs (A-B-A). At a minimum, it requires that each series recur (A-B-A-B). Cross-cutting, for its part, is only one of the forms of alternating editing within which series of events supposedly unfold simultaneously in the narrative universe suggested by the film. Thus, in our view, The Watermelon Patch is a true example of cross-cutting. (...) Here, then, is a film which demonstrates a degree of narrative planning and sophistication quite rare for 1905. It is the true prototype of cross-cutting, for which film historians of every generation have been searching for many years now. And it is the prototype of cross-cutting despite the fact that it is just as much a worthy representative of the paradigm of attraction." – André Gaudreault, Philippe Gauthier. - An important discovery in the research of alternating editing (montage alternant), and crosscutting or parallel editing (montage alterné) as illuminated in Gaudreault and Gauthier's essay in The Griffith Project 12 book. - Also a disturbingly racist film.

EILEEN BOWSER: THE TELEPHONE THRILLER; OR, THE TERRORS OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY (THE JONATHAN DENNIS MEMORIAL LECTURE 2008)


Lois Weber & Phillip Smalley: Suspense (US 1913) starring Lois Weber (wife), Val Paul (husband) and Sam Kaufman (tramp). From: Helena Barbas: Narrative Bifurcation, April 2011, via ResearchGate.

Eileen Bowser, Curator Emerata (at the MoMA 1954–1993) lectured on the telephone thriller. The new perception of time and space. But in a more fragmented way. The telephone and how it changed life. Telephone-themed postcards.
Are You There? / A Telephone Romance. GB 1901. PC: James Williamson. Starring James Dalton. Print: BFINA.
The typical image was the triple screen. Edwin S. Porter: College Chums (US 1907). The telephone thriller flourished until 1914.
The Telephone. US 1910. PC: Vitagraph. Starring Leo Delaney (husband), Rose Tapley (wife), Dolores Costello (child). Print: BFINA. – Cat overturns gas lamp, fire breaks out, mother calls, switchboard, fire brigade, father learns at the club, fire brigade enters, child rescued, mother faints, fireman rescues mother.
Suspense. US 1913. PC: Rex. D: Lois Weber, Phillip Smalley. SC: Lois Weber. Cast: Lois Weber (wife), Val Paul (husband), Douglas Gerrard (pursuer), Sam Kaufman (tramp). Print: BFINA. – EB: The telephone thriller was well established. LW wanted to see how far one could go. – Always exciting and surprising with the unexpected camera angles, mirror reflections and triangle screens.

La merveilleuse journée

Merkillinen matka. FR 1928. PC: Cinéromans–Films de France. D+SC: René Barberis - based on the play by Yves Mirande & Gustave Quinson (1922); DP: Raoul Aubourdier; AD: Georges Quénu [?]; filmed: Cannes; Studios Cinéromans, Joinville; cast: André Roanne (Blaise), Dolly Davis (Gladys), Renée Veller (Geneviève), Sylvio de Pedrelli (Felloux), Marcel Lesieur (Dr. Gébus), Léon Larive (Pinède), Reine Derns (Léocadie Pinède); 2250 m /22 fps/ 90 min; print: AFF/CNC. Original in French with e-subtitles in English and Italian, grand piano: Philip C. Carli. Viewed at Le Giornate del Cinema Muto, Pordenone, Cinema Verdi, 8 October 2008. - Lenny Borger: "For an all-too-brief moment in the late 1920s, René Barberis basked in a warm glow as a promising commercial comedy director. His films pleased for their infectious humor, nontheatrical acting, and elegant visuals. Barberis had been to a good school: as an assistant director at the powerful Cinéromans-Films de France studios (...), he had worked closely with Henri Fescourt (...). The international success of the Hugo epic, along with Fescourt’s patronage, helped project Barberis into the director’s chair. (...)
Barberis found his mark with his third film, La Merveilleuse journée, a breezy adaptation of a 1922 stage comedy by Yves Mirande (...) and theatrical entrepreneur Gustave Quinson. Mirande and Quinson had struck box-office gold with their earliest Boulevard collaboration, Le Chasseur de Chez Maxim’s (1920), a play so popular it has been filmed no less than five times since 1926! La Merveilleuse journée was filmed a mere three times, but the Barberis version was the first and best. And it starred the romantic comedy couple of the moment, Dolly Davis and André Roanne.
Usually playing the sophisticated young man-about-town, Roanne here is a timid Harold Lloyd-type, a pharmacist’s assistant in a Côte d’Azur backwater who one day gets stuck on board the yacht of a depressed millionaire who had been consulting Roanne’s employer and a local quack doctor (shades of Dr. Knock!). Entertained by Roanne’s refreshing naïveté, the bored tycoon invites him to join the entourage as his private secretary. They set sail for Cannes, where Roanne discovers the high life of luxury hotels and casinos, courts the mysterious beauty who lives across the hotel corridor, and almost without knowing it wins a fortune at the baccarat table, only to lose it again to his wealthy employer...
Despite some less than successful moments of physical farce, La Merveilleuse journée was above-average romantic comedy, beautifully photographed by Cinéromans cameraman Raoul Aubourdier. Barberis directed the actors smartly and kept the Roanne-Davis star package fresh by pairing each with a different romantic foil. Even the foreign press in Paris warmed to the picture. Variety, usually so contemptuous of French films in the 1920s, called it “snappy and diverting” and “excellently acted”. (...)" – Lenny Borger. - AA: Having seen the beginning only I agree with LB that this looks like a charming and witty romantic comedy. Fun with the desperate doctor and pharmacist in a town which is so healthy that they risk going out of business. Fun with the love-hungry pharmacist's wife always putting her hands and more at the poetic pharmacist's assistant. Fun with the millionaire and his "ennui incurable". "Nous partons pour Cannes".

Two Daughters of Eve


D. W. Griffith: Two Daughters of Eve (1912) with Claire McDowell (mother), Henry B. Walthall (father) and Florence Geneva (showgirl).

US 1912. PC: Biograph. D: D. W. Griffith; DP: G. W. Bitzer; cast: Claire McDowell (mother), Henry B. Walthall (father), Florence Geneva (showgirl), Robert Harron, D.W. Griffith, W. Christy Cabanne, Harry Carey; Betacam SP (transfer from 8 mm acetate print, 16 fps),
    12’
    print source: Andres Benz Collection, Neckarsulm.
    Original in English with e-subtitles in Italian, grand piano: Andreas Benz.
    Viewed in Le Giornate del Cinema Muto, Pordenone, Ridotto del Verdi, 7 October 2008.

The New York Dramatic Mirror: "Deep in the breasts of most women, underneath the painted exterior of many, lie the same natural spontaneous instincts of true womanhood. This is the truth brought out in this drama dealing with love and sacrifice of two women. One possesses a husband, a child, and money, and the other is doing a song and dance in the chorus of a cheap musical show. The child becomes lost one afternoon while the parents are visiting in the neighborhood of the theater, and is found in the arms of the chorus girl. The mother snatches the child away, fearful lest it should become contaminated with such company. By a peculiar twist of fortune, in the months that follow this incident, the husband becomes enamored with the charms of the pretty chorus girl and neglects his wife so that she is forced to leave him. Soon afterward, he loses his fortune, and when the chorus girl turns against him, he is left to realize his bitter condition. The mother, unable to find employment, as a last resort applies at the theater, where she met the other woman months before. At first the girl laughs at the mother, but is afterward touched by her sorrow and destitute condition. Following the mother into the dressing-room, she gives her jewels that rightfully belong to her; jewels that the husband has squandered his money upon. It proves the mother’s temporal salvation, and the chorus girl returning home with her, is now allowed to kiss the child. The husband is forgiven and the little family of three go out to start life over again, while the chorus girl retires into the background with sad and longing eyes. It is a story of vivid contrasts.” The New York Dramatic Mirror, 25 September 1912, p.32 [DWG Project # 427].

AA: a film so laconic, it's hard to follow. Ostensibly melodramatic, it reverses expectations. The showgirl shows love and compassion to all. The mother must learn the hard way. The husband cheats them both. It's rare to see full-figured Rubensian female charms with DWG, and Florenca Geneva belongs to the Marilyn Monroe tradition of American cinema. An early appearance of Lillian Gish as an extra.

Saved from Himself


D. W. Griffith: Saved from Himself (US 1911). Joseph Graybill (the young clerk) and Mabel Normand (the stenographer). My screenshot from YouTube.

US 1911. PC: Biograph. D: D. W. Griffith; cast: Joseph Graybill, Mabel Normand, Charles Hill Mailes, William J. Butler; Betacam SP (transfer from 8 mm acetate print, 16 fps), 16', print source: Andreas Benz Collection, Neckarsulm. Original in English with e-subtitles in Italian, grand piano: Andreas Benz. Viewed at Le Giornate del Cinema Muto, Pordenone, Ridotto del Verdi, 7 October 2008. – Charlie Keil: "A young hotel clerk engaged to be married invests his life’s savings in the stock market. When the stocks’ value begins to drop, his broker alerts him that it is essential he send another $2,000 in order to prevent a total loss. The temptation offered by a large amount of money deposited at the hotel for safekeeping almost proves too much, but the man is prevented from incriminating himself by his fiancée’s influence." – Charlie Keil [DWG Project # 379]. – AA: the Killiam /Blackhawk version with their introduction. Woman prevents man from crime, last minute rescue, man and flower in final image. Good to see Normand in a straight, non-comic role.

The Revenue Man and the Girl

US 1911. PC: Biograph. D: D.W. Griffith; DP: G.W. Bitzer; cast: Dorothy West (the moonshiner's daughter), Edwin August (the revenue man), Gladys Egan, Charles Hill Mailes, Charles H. West; Betacam SP (transfer from 8mm acetate print, 16 fps), 14’; print source: Andreas Benz Collection, Neckarsulm. Original in English with e-subtitles in Italian, grand piano: Andreas Benz. Viewed in Le Giornate del Cinema Muto, Pordenone, Ridotto del Verdi, 7 October 2008. - David Mayer: "The moonshiner’s daughter is first seen caressing and kissing her pet dove. Carrying hollowed gourds to be used as “jugs” for the distilled brew, she is sent by her father to assist at the illegal still. Meanwhile, pair of revenue men sneak through the forest, intent on discovering the still. Coming upon the girl’s cabin, the revenue men arrest and disarm two moonshiners, then begin their trek to take the arrested men back to jail. Alerted to the men’s arrest by the younger daughter, the moonshiners arm themselves and track the revenuers to the point at which they are handing the arrested men to other unidentified law officers. In the gun battle between the revenue men and the moonshiners, the girl’s father and one of the revenuers are killed. The other revenue man, frightened and disoriented, runs from his pursuers, loses his rife in a fast-moving creek, and reaches a temporary hiding place exhausted and unarmed. The girl, discovering her father’s corpse and that of the slain revenuer, mourns her parent and promises vengeance against revenuers even as she abuses the revenue man’s dead body. With the father buried and mourned, the girl, armed with a rifle, joins the remaining moonshiners in pursuit of the hidden revenuer. She stalks the fugitive through the forest, spies him, and is about to take aim, when her pet dove drops from a tree directly onto the revenue man. He picks up and caresses the dove, feeds it (revenue men always carry birdseed just in case, especially when they’re on tax raids in Kentucky, where white doves tend to plummet suddenly from trees), and releases it. Observing the revenue man’s kindness to the dove and moved by his gentleness, the girl is now disposed to be kinder to the revenue man. She takes him to her cabin, hides him beneath her bed, and pretends to be asleep when the moonshiner posse comes in pursuit. Having successfully saved the revenue man, the girl sends him on his way, but he hangs back, declares his love for the girl, and, after some hesitation on her part, gets her to confess her affection for her. We last see them as, backs to the camera and her belongings in a bundle tied to a stick, they stroll from the forest onto a country road leading to town." – David Mayer [DWG Project # 361]. - AA: a naive, strong, compact drama. Print stems from the Paul Killiam edition with his introduction. Impressive brevity, strong sense of the nature.

A Modern Musketeer (2006 DFI restoration) (I viewing: first half seen in Pordenone 2008)


Allan Dwan: A Modern Musketeer (US 1917) starring Douglas Fairbanks (Ned Thacker/d'Artagnan).

Nykyajan muskettisoturi. US 1917. PC: Douglas Fairbanks Pictures Corporation/Artcraft. P: Douglas Fairbanks; D+SC: Allan Dwan, based on the story “D’Artagnan of Kansas” by E. P. Lyle, Jr.; cin: Hugh McClung, Harris Thorpe, asst: Glen MacWilliams; ed: William Shea; gen. mgr: John Fairbanks; cast: Douglas Fairbanks (Ned Thacker/d’Artagnan), Marjorie Daw (Elsie Dodge), Kathleen Kirkham (her mother), Frank Campeau (Chin-de-dah, a Navaho), Eugene Ormonde (Forrest Vandeteer [Barris]), Tully Marshall (James Brown), Edythe Chapman (Mrs. Thacker); Zasu Pitts (Kansas Belle), Jim Mason (bandit), Charles Stevens (Indian); 1333 m /16 fps/ 73 min; print: DFI. Digital 2K restoration by DFI in 2006 from a complete 35 mm duplicate negative held at DFI and an incomplete 35 mm duplicate negative held by MoMA. Original in English with e-subtitles in Italian, grand piano: Ian Mistrorigo. Viewed at Le Giornate del Cinema Muto, Pordenone, Cinema Verdi, 7 October 2008.

Thomas Christensen: "(...) long thought to survive as a fragment (only the first 3 reels were preserved by the MoMA), but a complete version was eventually located with the DFI. The DFI restored the film in 2006, with the kind assistance of MoMA and Lobster Films, Paris. In the last part of the film, the intertitles are translated from the extant Danish titles. The typeface has been maintained, and an attempt has been made to maintain the tone of the first 3 reels. Nevertheless, a keen eye will notice slight flaws, such as the character Vandeteer’s name changing to Barris." – Thomas Christensen

Jeffrey Vance and Tony Maietta: "This restoration is a major event in silent film scholarship. As the first Douglas Fairbanks-Allan Dwan collaboration for Artcraft Pictures, A Modern Musketeer (1917) proved to be significant as the link between Fairbanks’s contemporary comedies and the later costume films."

A flamboyant action comedy-adventure based on E.P. Lyle Jr.’s story “D’Artagnan of Kansas” (... 1912), A Modern Musketeer winningly combines elements of comedy and melodrama. Moreover, as the title suggests, it was the harbinger of the great things to come, for in it Fairbanks dons the cloak and sword of the legendary fourth musketeer for the first time. Fairbanks was testing the waters of public acceptance of himself in a costume film. Appearing as d’Artagnan in early sequences, Fairbanks is wonderfully acrobatic as the Gascon swordsman, particularly in his first sequence, in which his chivalrous nature is showcased as he slays a tavern full of adversaries to obtain the lost handkerchief of a damsel in questionable distress. However, most of A Modern Musketeer is dedicated to exploring the exploits of Ned Thacker (Fairbanks), who emulates d’Artagnan as a result of his mother’s prenatal influence. (His romantic mother read the Dumas novel incessantly during her pregnancy with Ned, resulting in his being instilled with the spirit of the Gascon hero.) The Kansas community can barely contain the frustrated young man, who literally climbs the steeple of a nearby church to vent his pent-up energy. His father takes a page from Dumas’s novel and provides Ned with the 20th-century equivalent of d’Artagnan’s plug horse: a Model T Ford. As the irrepressible young man makes his way across the dusty prairie, he happens upon a trio whose transcontinental auto tour has been disrupted by a washed-out bridge. He is immediately enamored of the youngest member, pretty Elsie Dodge (Marjorie Daw), who is accompanied by her 45-year-old suitor, Forrest Vandeteer (Eugene Ormonde), and her mother (Kathleen Kirkham). Ned comes to their rescue by ingeniously adapting his Model T to maneuver on the nearby railroad tracks, and effortlessly conveys them to the El Tovar Hotel near the rim of the Grand Canyon."

The chivalrous spirit of d’Artganan is quickly called into service at the hotel as Ned discovers that the respected Vandeteer is in actuality a bigamist and embezzler. Further, he finds that a Navaho chief, Chin-de-dah (Frank Campeau), intends to abduct Elsie and make her his latest “bride.” The exciting climax of the film finds Ned literally scaling down the walls of the Grand Canyon on a rope to vanquish the evil Navaho, rescue Elsie, and elicit a full confession from the villainous Vandeteer. The tableau of the Grand Canyon serves as a stunning backdrop for Ned and Elsie to embrace at the film’s happy conclusion."

The breathtaking scenery of the Grand Canyon, superbly photographed by cinematographers Hugh McClung, Harris Thorpe, and Glen MacWilliams, under Dwan’s direction, helped to make A Modern Musketeer an outstanding artistic achievement. Cast and crew went on location in October 1917 to the Grand Canyon and the Canyon de Chelly in Arizona, where they camped in tents during the 3-week location shoot. Fairbanks was in his element on location with the stunning landscapes, distinctive rock imagery, and the community of Hopi and Navaho people. “I was disappointed in the Grand Canyon,” he joked. “I couldn’t jump it.”"

(...) The film was a great commercial success. The New York Times proclaimed that A Modern Musketeer was “quite the most amazing of any which have yet come from the Fairbanks laboratory,” and Variety declared that the film “ranks with the best” of the Fairbanks Artcraft series of films. A great sadness for film history is that six subsequent Fairbanks comedies made for Artcraft are unavailable for reappraisal: (...) and The Knickerbocker Buckaroo from the following year, are lost. This makes the restoration of A Modern Musketeer – available on DVD in a high-definition transfer, with a musical score compiled by Rodney Sauer and performed by the Mont Alto Motion Picture Orchestra of Boulder, Colorado – an achievement all silent film enthusiasts can celebrate." - Jeffrey Vance and Tony Maietta

A successful digital restoration, digital artefacts hardly evident. A funny intro. Before he is born, there is the spirit of d'Artagnan loved by his mother and the cyclone raging over Kansas. Always chivalrous, always misunderstood. Incredible sequence where Ned climbs to the top of the town church tower. - The witty intertitles have the same style as Anita Loos with several Fairbanks films such as Wild and Woolly of the same year. - I saw the first half only, having to rush to the rare Griffith screening.

My blog note of my second viewing of A Modern Musketeer, the full film in Bologna in 2013.

W.K.L. DICKSON 3: "BIOGRAPHING"

Paul Spehr: "In April 1894 Dickson left Edison under a cloud. He was accused of helping a potential rival, the Latham family, develop a competing camera and projector. The extent to which he aided the Lathams is open to question – everyone, himself included, denies his involvement, but he was the most experienced of those involved, so suspicions remain. But there is no question that he aided his friends Elias B. Koopman, Harry Marvin, and Herman Casler (the KMCD group) in developing a moving image system that was soon Edison’s principal domestic competition. The American Mutoscope Co. was created at the end of 1895 (almost simultaneously with the premiere of the Lumières’ Cinématographe). The company was initially formed to exploit its peepshow machine, the Mutoscope, but the sensation caused by the Cinématographe, followed by the popularity of Edison’s Vitascope, caused them to change course and offer projection. Dickson’s skill as a filmmaker was one of the company’s chief assets. He was responsible for film production, and he elaborated the system he created for Edison. His new studio was an improved design; facilities to develop and process film were more elaborate; and the staff hired and trained included Billy Bitzer and Arthur Marvin – names familiar to Griffith enthusiasts. But by the summer of 1896, when they were ready to make films, it was clear that audiences wanted variety, and favored films taken on location, so even though the company’s camera was designed for studio work it was taken on the road. After establishing production in New York, which Dickson called “Biographing”, he moved on to London and repeated the process in England. Production facilities in France and Germany followed." Paul Spehr
ANNABELLE IN FLAG DANCE / FLAG DANCE BY ANNABELLE (American Mutoscope Co., US 1896). Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: ?; cast: Annabelle Whitford; filmed: rooftop studio, New York City, summer 1896; AMCo. Prod. No. 35; 35mm [blow-up from 16mm], 22 ft., 20” (18 fps); print: LoC. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "Sandow and Peerless Annabelle were the first performers filmed by the new American Mutoscope Co. Annabelle reprised her Butterfly Dance and several others, among them this example of American patriotism." Paul Spehr
HARD WASH (American Mutoscope Co., US 1896) Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: G.W. “Billy” Bitzer; cast: “Jo-Jo” & his mother; filmed: rooftop studio, NewYork City, summer 1896; © 1896 68818 & 1903 H32079; AMCo. Prod.No. 39; 35mm [blow-up from 16mm], 22 ft., 20” (18 fps); print: LoC. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "This scene of an African-American woman vigorously scrubbing a black baby was immensely popular with early audiences, and was featured on Biograph’s programs in London and Paris, as well as various locations in the U.S. Edison’s almost identical version, A Morning Bath, was made a few weeks after this was first shown." – Paul Spehr
RIP VAN WINKLE: RIP’S TOAST (American Mutoscope Co., US 1896) Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: G.W. Bitzer; cast: Joseph Jefferson; filmed: Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts, late August 1896; © 1896 69095 & 1902 H25401; AMCo. Prod. No. 45; 35mm [blow-up from 16mm pos.], 33 ft., 29” (18 fps); print: LoC. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "Dickson filmed Joseph Jefferson in scenes from his most popular role, Rip Van Winkle. Seven films were made outdoors at Jefferson’s Massachusetts estate. Jefferson had commissioned Dion Boucicault’s adaptation of Washington Irving’s popular tale, and had been touring in it since 1865. Jefferson’s son Charles B. Jefferson was the producer of Sandow’s variety show, which contracted for the first public showing of the Biograph projection (in September 1896), and he probably arranged this filming. Although this is probably the first multi-part drama ever filmed, before 1900 the 7 scenes were rarely shown as a grouping. This scene, Rip’s Toast, is the one that most early audiences saw." – Paul Spehr
MCKINLEY AT HOME, CANTON, OHIO (Wm. McKinley Receiving Telegram Announcing His Election) (American Mutoscope Co., US 1896) Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: G.W. Bitzer; cast: William McKinley; filmed: Canton, Ohio, 18.9.1896; © 1896, 61793; AMCo. Prod. No. 72; 35mm [blow-up from 16mm pos.], 49.5 ft., 44” (18 fps); print: LoC. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "The first political campaign film. It was staged to show the Republican presidential candidate William McKinley in a manner suiting his wellpublicized front porch campaign. The tranquil scene of McKinley and an assistant strolling from his porch to a sunny spot in front of the camera masked the hubbub of a day that was the busiest of the campaign. Trainloads of supporters streamed into Canton, Ohio, and paraded to McKinley’s house,where the candidate greeted them from a platform at the front of the yard – conveniently off-camera. This film, and 4 films of a campaign parade that same day, were undoubtedly made at the behest of McKinley’s supporters. Abner McKinley, the candidate’s brother, was a stockholder in the American Mutoscope Co., and a number of railroad executives were on the company’s board. McKinley’s campaign had strong support from railroad companies, who gave particular assistance to the events of the day by offering cheap train rides from Pittsburgh,major points in Ohio, and as far away as Chicago for groups supporting McKinley. The film was shown on 12 October 1896, at the company’s official New York premiere, to an invited audience of party officials and railroad executives, who cheered, demanded a re-run, and were embarrassed when they realized that they had shouted “Speech! Speech!” to a shadow on a screen. On 2 November 1896, Election Day, it was projected on an outside screen at the NewYorkWorld’s Pulitzer Building as part of the paper’s election coverage." – Paul Spehr
EMPIRE STATE EXPRESS NO. 1 (Empire State Express, N.Y. Central R.R.) (American Mutoscope Co., US 1896) Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: G.W. Bitzer; filmed: Palatine, NY, [2].10.1896; © 1897 68807 & 1902 H30327; AMCo. Prod. No. 77; 35mm [blow-up from 16mm pos.], 21.5 ft., 19” (18 fps); print: LoC. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "Dickson, with Bitzer as his assistant, filmed the NewYork Central Railroad’s crack train, the Empire State Express, running at the record speed of 60 miles per hour. According to the Canastota Bee, 3 October 1896, the film was taken at Palatine, near Canastota,NewYork, the home of Henry Marvin and Herman Casler of the American Mutoscope Co. According to a contemporary timetable, the train was due at Palatine at 12:13 pm. This film was a sensation wherever it premiered, and was probably the initiator of the reports that early audiences fainted and ducked under their seats. Such reports appeared in papers in New York, London, and Paris following the first showing. [Note: This is a blow-up from a 16mm copy made from a Paper Print, and does not reflect the film’s original pictorial quality.]" – Paul Spehr
NIAGARA FALLS: AMERICAN FALLS FROM LUNA ISLAND + AMERICAN FALLS FROM GOAT ISLAND (American Mutoscope Co., US 1896) Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: G.W. Bitzer; filmed: Niagara Falls, NY, 9.1896; © 1897 3553 & 1903 H30732 + © 1897 3560 & 1903 H30733;AMCo. Prod. No. 63 + 64; due film assieme/2 films combined, 35mm, 71 ft., 38” (30? fps); print: MoMA. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "The first movie audiences took particular delight in scenes of rushing, churning water. These scenes of Niagara Falls were taken in September 1896, while Dickson and Bitzer were filming McKinley and the Empire State Express. It is no coincidence that New Yorkers (and others) going to the Falls might travel on the Empire State Express.When Dickson and his partners, Marvin, Casler, and Koopman, created the American Mutoscope Co. their objective was advertising first; entertainment was an afterthought. Recent scholarship has compared these and similar films to 19th-century paintings of the Falls by Frederic Edwin Church,William Morris Hunt, and others (see “Experiencing Nature in Early Film,” by Katherine Manthorne, in Early Film and American Artistic Traditions, Hudson Hills Press & Williams College, 2005). Dickson was probably familiar with these paintings.He was not alone in filming the Falls.His trip to Niagara coincided with that of Alexandre Promio for Lumière, and Edison’s James White and William Heise arrived soon after." – Paul Spehr
CHARGE PAR ESCADRONS, EXÉCUTÉE PAR LE 1er RÉGT. DE CUIRASSIERS (Charge of the French Cuirassiers – Paris) (The Mutoscope & Biograph Syndicate, GB 1897) Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: ?; filmed: Bois de Boulogne, Paris; 8/9.1897;AMCo. Prod.No. 83E; 35mm, 700 frames (44 ft.), 23.5” (30? fps); print: NFM. Preservato Preserved from a 68mm original. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "After launching production in London Dickson traveled to the Continent; the first stop was Paris, where this restaging of a familiar Lumière subject was made. Dickson had undoubtedly seen the Lumières’ film, as it was one of the most popular films on the program at the Union Square Theater during the summer of 1896, and the theater was only a short walk from the American company’s New York headquarters. In an effort to intensify the effect of the assault, the horses charge the camera, passing on both sides. As described by H.L. Adam (in his article “Round the World for the Biograph”, published in The Royal Magazine, June 1901): “At another military display, in France, the photographer confesses that he himself was nearly answerable for the premature quietus of a fellow creature. It was a charge of Cuirassiers, and as they were approaching,Mr. Dickson waved his hand as a signal for them to take a slightly different direction. They answered to the signal, swerved, collided, and down went one of their number, biting the dust in curious confusion.” – Paul Spehr
A CAMP OF ZINGAREE GYPSIES (The Mutoscope and Biograph Syndicate, GB 1897) Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: ?; filmed: near Budapest, 9.1897; AMCo. Prod. No. 87E; 35mm, 41 ft., 27” (30? fps); print: NFM. Preserved from a 68mm original. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "In September 1897 Dickson was in Austria-Hungary and Germany to film subjects suitable for European audiences – and those in the U.S. as well. While in Budapest he went to the countryside to film local scenes. As described in the Biograph Company’s 1902 catalogue: “The real Zingari gypsy is an exceedingly picturesque person, quite different from the wandering nomads we are accustomed to see in America.Our photographer was very fortunate in getting one of these camps by the side of a Hungarian highway, and his work was so successful that one could hardly get a better insight into the life of the strange people if he were to spend months traveling in their own country.The naked children are rolling about on the grass with the dogs, the women are smoking pipes and cooking the evening meal over an out-door fire.The mother is telling fortunes for a stranger, and the whole scene is one of animation. Photographically the view is almost perfect.”" – Paul Spehr
MILITARY EXERCISE – ALDERSHOT (A Terrible Spill) (The Mutoscope and Biograph Syndicate, GB 1898) Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: ?; filmed: Aldershot, England, 18.2.1898; AMCo. Prod. No. 108E; 35mm, 896 frames (56 ft.), 29” (30? fps); print: NFM. Preserved from a 68mm original. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "Military subjects were consistent crowd-pleasers, and this film showing a near fatal accident was especially popular. As described in the company’s 1902 catalogue: “One of the best known and one of the most sensational moving pictures ever made. ... Our camera was stationed at the side of an English run-way filled with obstructions, which is used for cavalry exercises, at Aldershot. Picture to be taken was a number of hussars jumping one of the stiffest of the obstacles. The horses came over in fine form, one after another, until almost the end of the picture,when one of them slips throwing the cavalryman over his head and falling heavily on top of him.The other horsemen immediately following barely escape landing on the prostrate horse and man. The latter was severely injured. At the end of the picture several soldiers are seen running up, picking him up and carrying him away.”" – Paul Spehr
CONWAY CASTLE – PANORAMIC VIEW OF CONWAY ON THE L. & N.W. RAILWAY (Conway Castle) (The Mutoscope and Biograph Syndicate, GB 1898) Supv: W.K.L.Dickson; ph: Emile Lauste; filmed: Conway,Wales, 2.1898; AMCo. Prod. No. 107E; 35mm, 142 ft., 2’11” (30? fps), col. (printed on colour stock, reproducing original hand-colouring?); print: NFM. Preserved from a 68mm original. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "The Irish Mail train filmed on the London & Northwest Railway at Conway, Wales. One of the most popular of the “phantom ride” films, it shows a panorama of the countryside and the castle as the train runs through the Welsh countryside." – Paul Spehr
IRISH MAIL – L. & N.W. RAILWAY – TAKING UP WATER AT FULL SPEED! (The “Jennie Dean” – Bushey) (The Mutoscope and Biograph Syndicate, GB 1898) Supv: W.K.L.Dickson; ph: Emile Lauste; filmed: Bushey, England, 2.1898; AMCo. Prod. No. 112E; 35mm, 116 ft., 1’54” (30? fps); print: NFM. Preserved from a 68mm original. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "On the same trip promoting the Irish Mail, Dickson captured this remarkable scene, on the London & Northwest Railway, at Bushey, England. The camera is mounted on a train running parallel with the Irish Mail, pulled by an engine named the Jennie Dean. During the filming a third train passes between the two.Near the end of the shot the trains change tracks, allowing a better angle for recording the process of taking water from troughs along the track." – PAUL SPEHR
FEEDING THE PIGEONS IN ST. MARK’S SQUARE, VENICE (The Mutoscope and Biograph Syndicate, GB 1898) Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: Emile Lauste; cast: W.K.L. Dickson; filmed: 5-6.1898; 35mm, 79 ft., c.50” (24 fps); print: BFI National Archive, London. Preserved from a 68mm original (Schultze Collection). No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "While in Italy to persuade Pope Leo XIII to appear on film Dickson made several side trips for filming. Most were to film supplementary religious subjects, but in Venice he filmed tourist sites. His appearance in this film, shot in front of St. Mark’s and near Quadri’s, might seem ego-driven, but it was probably to control the young girl who was featured. She had a tendency to forget the pigeons and distractedly wander off-camera, but she returned when bidden by Mr. D. The girl and the woman are unidentified." –Paul Spehr
POPE LEO XIII (The Mutoscope and Biograph Syndicate, GB 1898) Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: Emile Lauste; cast: Pope Leo XIII, Count Camillo Pecci, Mons. DellaVolpe; filmed: giardini del Vaticano, Roma, 5-6.1898; 35mm, 345 ft., c.5’ (30? fps); print: NFM. Preserved from 68mm originals. No intertitles. 5 scenes:
(1) Pope Leo XIII, carried through the Vatican Loggia on his way to the Sistine Chapel
(2) Pope Leo XIII, in his carriage, passing through the Vatican Gardens with escort of noble guard commanded by Count Camillo Pecci. His Holiness is met by His Excellence, Monsignor Della Volpe
(3) Pope Leo XIII in his chair
(4) Pope Leo XIII, resting on his way to his summer villa
(5) Pope Leo XIII, walking at twilight through some favourite haunt in the Vatican Gardens
Paul Spehr: "Dickson considered the films he made of Pope Leo XIII in the Vatican to be one of the outstanding achievements of his career, and his contemporaries agreed. The Pope was rarely seen, since he continued a protest of the political status of the Papal States begun by his predecessor and refused to leave the Vatican. Because of his age (88) and frequent illnesses his advisors were reluctant to let him be filmed, but they apparently relented when persuaded that the Pope could extend his blessing to people that he could not reach otherwise.The Pope consented to pose for 6 or 7 films.The exact number taken is confused because of changes made in how they were exhibited and the different titles applied to suit the anticipated audiences.The first public exhibition was at New York’s Carnegie Hall, 14 December 1898, but by agreement the papal films were not shown on the company’s programs at variety theatres. Many people saw them on Mutoscopes or at specially arranged projections." – Paul Spehr
THE VATICAN MILITARY GUARD, CONSISTING OF A DETACHMENT OF NOBLE GUARDS, COMMANDED BY COUNT PECCI, FOLLOWED BY A PALATINE GUARD OF HONOUR, SWISS GUARD, GENDARMES, AND FIRE BRIGADE (The Mutoscope and Biograph Syndicate, GB 1898) Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: Emile Lauste; filmed: Vaticano, Roma, 4-6.1898; 35mm, 77 ft., 50” (30? fps); print: NFM. Preserved from a 68mm original. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "The short lengths of film available required careful staging, with no allowance for waste, and this scene is an outstanding example of Dickson’s ability to compress visual information to create interest and clarity. Five units of Vatican militia were succinctly recorded in a film lasting less than a minute. The groups approach the camera in an “S” pattern, which allows maximum viewing of each unit. Though the camera is elevated to give perspective, the units pass close enough that faces can be clearly distinguished." – Paul Spehr
THE CORONATION OF QUEEN WILHELMINA OF HOLLAND AT AMSTERDAM (The Mutoscope and Biograph Syndicate, GB 1898). Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: Emile Lauste; cast: Queen Wilhelmina, Queen Mother Emma; filmed: Amsterdam, 6.9.1898; 35mm, 399 ft., c.6’ (30? fps); print: NFM. Preserved from 68mm originals. No intertitles. /6 scenes (order may vary):
(1) Plechtige intocht van H.M. Koningin Wilhelmina in Amsterdam / Wilhelmina Vertrekt per Koets Van CS [Royal Procession of HM Queen Wilhelmina in Amsterdam / Wilhelmina Departs by Carriage from Central Station]
(2) Arrival of the Queen at the Palace, Amsterdam, Sept 6th
(3) Review of the Royal Netherland Guards in the Costumes of the Middle Ages (Coronation of Wilhelmina Guard of Honor)
(4) The Royal Procession to the Church before the Coronation Ceremony
(5) The Royal Procession from the Church after the Coronation Ceremony
(6) The Queen and the Queen Mother on the Palace Balcony Responding to the Call of the Populace (The Queen and Her People)
Paul Spehr: "Six films made in September 1898 recorded the coronation ceremonies of Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands in Amsterdam. Wilhelmina had succeeded to the throne on the death of her father in 1890, but her mother, Queen Emma, had been regent untilWilhelmina reached the age of 18 in September 1898. She is shown arriving and leaving the church, reviewing guards dressed in costumes of the Middle Ages, and waving to the crowd from a balcony of the Palace.This series was filmed in segments that could be shown individually or grouped together to document the event. During the late 1890s the British and American Mutoscope companies provided timely coverage of events of the day, and audiences were intrigued by more detailed and candid views of royalty." – Paul Spehr
LAUNCH OF THE “OCEANIC” (The Mutoscope and Biograph Syndicate, GB 1899) Supv: W.K.L.Dickson; ph: Emile Lauste; filmed: Belfast, Ireland, 14.1.1899; AMCo. Prod. No. 299E; 35mm, 38 ft., 20.25” (30? fps); print: MoMA. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "This stunning shot records the launch of the largest passenger vessel built up to that time.The film was rushed to London to be on the screen at the Palace Theatre within 3 days of the launch. TheWarwick Trading Co. also filmed the event, and joined the race to the screen." – Paul Spehr
KING JOHN (A Scene – “King John”, Now Playing at Her Majesty’s Theatre: The Last Moments of King John of England in the Orchard of Swinstead Abbey / Beerbohm Tree, The Great English Actor) (The British Mutoscope and Biograph Company, GB 1899) Supv:W.K.L.Dickson; ph: ?; cast: Herbert Beerbohm Tree (King John), members of the cast from Her Majesty’s Theatre, London, England; filmed: Thames embankment studio, London, 18.9.1899; AMCo. Prod. No. 493E; 35mm, 84 ft., 57” (24 fps); print: BFINA. Preserved from a 68mm original from the NFM. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "Sir Herbert Beerbohm Tree, a leading performer of London’s theatre world, was recorded in 4 scenes from Shakespeare’s King John. It was a new role for him, and the film was made just prior to its opening. The Sketch’s H. Chance Newton reported “... [the] writer called upon Mr. Beerbohm Tree... found that popular actor-manager and his numerous adherents just passing through a most trying ordeal. In other words, Mr. Tree and the whole strength of his company were being ‘biographed’ wholesale, retail, and certainly for exportation, by that shrewd firm which supplies Animated Photographs to this or that amusement resort throughout the United Queendom… It was truly a very quaint experience to see this extensive company ... who will to-night (Wednesday) ... present... ‘King John’ ... Hurrying off clothed in more or less ‘complete steel’ – and in perfect makeup – to the vicinity of the Hotel Cecil, to be snapshotted, as it were, for pictures to be presently shown in all sorts of places in Europe, but especially at the Palace Theatre, London. For the going and coming and the to-ing and fro-ing of the latest King John and his vast retinue a new and picturesque awning had been prepared outside Her Majesty’s Theatre and several ‘Black Marias’ had been chartered for the carrying of the company .... There was also something of humour in the sight of ... hurrying back with the dark-blue-armoured King John Tree at their head, newly escaped from the clutches (and the ‘Kodaks’) of the Animated Photographers. ... the production, which, whatever its other merits may prove to be, will to-night assuredly be hailed as one of the grandest examples of mise-en-scène ever witnessed even at this theatre.”" – Paul Spehr
RIFLE HILL SIGNAL STATION NEAR FRERE CAMP (Rifle Hill Outpost) (The British Mutoscope and Biograph Company, GB 1899). Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph:William Cox? John Seward?; filmed: Camp Frere, South Africa, 7.12.1899; AMCo. Prod. No. 568E; 35mm, 46 ft., c.30” (24 fps); print: BFINA, London. Preserved from a 68mm original (Schultze Collection). No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "In the fall of 1899 Dickson was in South Africa filming the campaign to relieve the besieged British at Ladysmith during the Boer War. The huge and very visible camera made it difficult to get near combat, but Dickson seized opportunities to record actions that reflected the activities he and his associates were seeing. As Dickson described this scene in his book The Biograph in Battle: “We again visited the outposts, and managed, not without extreme difficulty, to haul our machine, &c., to the top of Rifle Hill signal station, just in time to catch a message from Colonel Kitchener [Author’s Note: not the General], which was flagged to picket No. 8, the operators kindly waiting until we got the machine in position before they sent the message. The men were watching the enemy below while the signalling was in progress, Captain Bartram being in command of signal and picket.This is a splendid scene, and one of which we are very proud, for we nearly killed ourselves and our horses in our endeavour to get planted in time. .... This is the message which was sent to O.C. No. 8 picket: ‘Have your picket under arms and send out patrol. Kitchener, December 7th.’ It was sent in plain flag, Morse, not code, so that any one who knew Morse could read this message.”" – Paul Spehr
BATTLE OF SPION KOP: AMBULANCE CORPS CROSSING THE TUGELA RIVER (Operations of Red Cross Ambulances after Spion Kop / Battle of the Upper Tugela) (The British Mutoscope and Biograph Company,GB 1899). Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: William Cox? John Seward?; filmed: Spion Kop, South Africa, 25.1.1900; AMCo. Prod. No. 591E; 35mm, 3 scenes, 37 ft. + 45 ft. + 47 ft., c.2’ (24 fps); print: BFINA, London. Preserved from 68mm originals (Schultze Collection). No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "A dramatic panorama of the valley of the Tugela River, with the British troops trailing home dejectedly after failing to take Spion Kop. The camera is behind a squad of British soldiers in a trench covering the retreat. The 1902 catalogue had this to say: “This is probably as near an actual scene of battle as a camera will ever get in modern warfare. It was taken from the second line of intrenchments [sic] during the battle of the Upper Tugela, in which the British, under General Buller met with defeat at the hands of the Boers. The British lost about 500 men in this engagement, and our picture, taken at the rear of the British fighting line, shows the wounded being brought in on litters, and in ambulances. The scope of the view is very broad, taking in the Tugela with its temporary pontoon bridge, and the reserve force on the opposite bank of the river, and the distant mountains where the Boers are stationed. Spion Kop is prominent among the peaks. Photographically the subject is sharp and clear.” Dickson, in his book The Biograph in Battle: “The battle rages on with unabated fury; the slaughter on both sides is obliged to be terrible. .... By morning three thousand of our braves had captured the mountain and driven the Boers off. This would have been a triumphant success had they been able to withstand the deadly cross-fire of the enemy ... they soon had to abandon or be utterly annihilated. Some... bitter disappointment. “We were not long in following with our Cape cart, and ... succeeded in getting a good picture of the Ambulance Corps crossing the Tugela River over a hurriedly spanned pontoon bridge. .... “The picture has an additional value that in the back-ground is part of the battlefield whereWarren’s men fought so gallantly as they advanced towards and up Spion Kop to the right. ... twenty minutes of valuable time had to be sacrificed in order to prove that General Buller’s permission covered our movements. ....” – Paul Spehr
GORDON HIGHLANDERS IN LADYSMITH (Ladysmith – Gordon Highlanders Marching Out to Meet Relief Column / Relief of Ladysmith) (The British Mutoscope and Biograph Company, GB, 1899). Supv:W.K.L.Dickson; ph: [W.K.L.Dickson]; filmed: Ladysmith, South Africa, 2-3.3.1900; AMCo. Prod. No. 613E; 35mm, 51 ft., 32” (24 fps); print: BFINA, London. Preserved from a 68mm original (Schultze Collection). No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "Dickson recorded the formal ceremonies for the relief of Ladysmith, where the Gordon Highlanders had been under siege by the Boers since 1 November 1899. (General Buller made an informal entry on the day before.) Dickson was filming under some handicap, as both of his assistants, Cox and Seward, were ill and had been taken back to Durban. An inexperienced assistant had been hired, but Dickson was also succumbing to enteric fever. Dickson (The Biograph in Battle): “...a busy day for all. By 10 a.m. we have secured a Biograph and other pictures of the beleaguered Gordon Highlanders en route from camp to welcome the entrance of the relief column, headed by General Buller and Staff. This is our next picture, but regretfully we must face the sun to secure it. Every facility has been given us by Colonel Scott, in command of the Highlanders, who, with other regiments, line the streets on both sides – our cart be conspicuously a nuisance, from the back of which we took the Bios.The cart had to displace the soldiers, the back reaching out into the street as we had no tripod … this we found impossible to drag over the mountain, and so had left it behind. ... I found standing at my side Winston Churchill. ....”" – Paul Spehr. - AA comments: a magnificent show. The Monkeyshines (1889) are to the cinema like the Lennart Nilsson photographs of an emergent baby in the mother's womb. These are some of the most valuable images of the history of the cinema, making sense in a new way in this programme. W.K.L. Dickson often favoured high speeds (30 fps or more, even 40-50 fps?), from his early Edison days to his latest Biograph wide image specials. Many films were shown much too slowly.

W.K.L. DICKSON 2: PRODUCTION IN THE BLACK MARIA

Paul Spehr: "Film production for public exhibition began early in 1894, in or immediately adjacent to the studio built on the grounds of Edison’s laboratory in Orange, New Jersey. The “Black Maria”, so-named by Edison’s staff because it reminded them of a police wagon, was purpose-built to resolve the exposure problems that plagued Dickson. The studio could be revolved on a pivot so the sun would flood the stage through the open roof, and the area behind the stage was a blackened recess designed to absorb ambient light (a technique borrowed from Marey). Filming was done during midday, when intense sunlight provided maximum contrast. The camera was mounted on an iron base to reduce vibration of the electric motor used to ensure a steady rate of exposure. Though it was bulky, the camera could move back and forth, and be raised or lowered to suit the subject being filmed. In order to reduce flicker, exposure was done at a high rate. The ideal was 46 frames per second, though most films were probably taken at about 30 fps. This controlled environment allowed Dickson to plan and rehearse each shot, and though his objective was to make the scene appear natural, even candid, his careful planning is evident in most of his films. Characteristically, the action begins before the camera starts, and continues after the camera stops. Though the viewer sees only a portion, it is the essential portion, and if staged successfully the viewer does not feel cheated." – Paul Spehr
ATHLETE WITH A WAND (Edison, US 1894). Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: William Heise; cast: athlete from the Newark Turnverein; filmed: Black Maria,Orange,NJ, 2.1894; 35mm [blow-up from 16mm pos.], 19 ft., 17” (18 fps); print: LoC. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "The influence of Muybridge and Marey is evident in this and in the film of Sandow that follows. However, Dickson’s film is longer, and the action is a bit more complex than the chronophotographers’ images. As was often the case, Dickson seems to acknowledge a debt to his contemporaries but strives for improvements. It’s not clear what the dog contributes, but Dickson liked animals and it is a pleasant addition." – Paul Spehr
SANDOW (Edison, US 1894). Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: William Heise; cast: Eugene Sandow; filmed: Black Maria,Orange, NJ, 6.3.1894; 35mm, 42 ft., 23” (30? fps); print: MoMA. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "The strongman Eugene Sandow was the first prominent variety performer to be filmed, and the occasion marks the symbolic beginning of production for the public. Sandow’s appearance at Koster & Bial’s Music Hall was something of a sensation, and his visit to Orange was covered extensively by the press, so it is not far-fetched to regard it as an advertisement. It promoted Sandow – and Edison’s Kinetoscope. Only a fraction of Sandow’s act was shown, but Dickson’s staging gave viewers a closer, more intimate exposure than theatre seats allowed, and gave people who could not come to the theatre an opportunity to see Sandow in action." – Paul Spehr
ANNABELLE, BUTTERFLY DANCE (Edison, US 1894). Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: William Heise; cast: Annabelle Whitford; filmed: Black Maria,Orange,NJ, 7-8.1894; 35mm, 36 ft., 18” (30? fps); print: MoMA. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "Annabelle Whitford (Annabelle Whitford Moore / Peerless Annabelle) was one of the most popular of the several professional dancers Dickson filmed for the Kinetoscope, and she was filmed the most often – she was re-filmed as the negatives wore out. Her Serpentine Dance was modeled after the dance made famous by Loïe Fuller, but it is probable that more people saw Annabelle’s filmed dances – or the numerous versions made by others – than saw Loïe Fuller." – Paul Spehr
CORBETT AND COURTNEY BEFORE THE KINETOGRAPH (Edison, US 1894). Supv: W.K.L.Dickson; ph:William Heise; cast: James J. Corbett, Peter Courtney; filmed: Black Maria,Orange, NJ, 7.9.1894; 35mm, 135 ft., 39” (30? fps); print: MoMA. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "The most costly, and sensational, of the early Kinetoscope films was the boxing match betweenWorld’s heavyweight champion James J.“Gentleman Jim” Corbett and Peter Courtney, billed as the champion of New Jersey. It was made for the Kinetoscope Exhibiting Company, who exhibited the bout on specially enlarged versions of Edison’s Kinetoscope. Six films, each a oneminute round,were made,with Courtney conveniently knocked out in Round 6.The visit of Corbett to Orange was widely reported in the sporting press. At the time, boxing was illegal in many parts of the U.S., including New Jersey, and Edison and Dickson were arraigned in court for conducting an illegal match.The judge dismissed the charges on the grounds that it was an exhibition, since the shortened rounds did not constitute a real fight." – Paul Spehr
SIOUX GHOST DANCE / GHOST DANCE (Edison,US 1894). Supv: W.K.L.Dickson; ph:William Heise; cast: members of Buffalo Bill’s Wild West [show]; filmed: Black Maria, Orange, NJ, 24.9.1894; 35mm [blow-up from 16mm pos.], 50 ft., 44” (18 fps); print: LoC. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "On 26 September 1894 the East Orange Gazette reported, “Wild West Kinetoscoped”. Dickson had filmed Buffalo Bill, Sioux Ghost Dance, and Buffalo Dance, all featuring members of Buffalo Bill’s Wild West troupe.The busy day was also reported in the New York Journal, Newark Evening News, and Orange Chronicle. Buffalo Bill demonstrated rapid rifle firing. Several ethnic groups were featured in Buffalo Bill’s Wild West, and a number of them were filmed in the Black Maria. This performance by members of the Sioux Tribe is unusual, and an important historical and ethnographic document. Misdirected concern about the cult of the Ghost Dance, which combined native culture with elements of Christianity, was a contributing factor to the massacre at Wounded Knee, South Dakota (29 December 1890)." – Paul Spehr
BUFFALO DANCE (Edison, US 1894). Supv: W.K.L.Dickson; ph:William Heise; cast: members of Buffalo Bill’s Wild West [show]; filmed: Black Maria, Orange, NJ, 24.9.1894; 35mm, 50 ft., 47” (17 fps); print: LoC. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "The Sioux Buffalo Dance was done to native drum music, and three Chiefs were present: Last Horse, Parts His Hair, and Hair Coat. Other members of the group were Black Cat, Charging Crow, Dull Knife, Holy Bear, Crazy Bull, Strong Talker, Pine, Little Eagle Horse, Young Bear, Johnny No Neck Burke, Seven Up, and Run About. It was quite an occasion, though filmings were often a social as well as business event. Mrs. Edison and her two daughters came to the Black Maria to watch. Also present were Major Jack Stillwell, the celebrated scout; John Shangren, interpreter; Major John M. Burke, manager of the Wild West show; and F. Madden, advertising manager." – Paul Spehr
BAND DRILL (Edison, US 1894). Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: William Heise; cast: Frank Baldwin (Steele Ayers, the band-master), Fred W. Boardman, William Cushing, Ad. Dorsch, E.P. Brown, J.F. Boardman, George Goddard, E.F. Balch, Paul Pfarr; filmed: Black Maria, Orange, NJ, late November 1894; 35mm, 50 ft., 19” (30? fps); print: LoC. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "During the fall of 1894 scenes from several NewYork theatrical productions were filmed.The musical MilkWhite Flag was playing at Hoyt’s Theatre, NewYork City, and 34 cast members were assembled on the small stage of the Black Maria for one film. Careful planning was needed to maneuver the band through its paces." – Paul Spehr

W. K. L. DICKSON 1: EXPERIMENTAL FILMS FOR EDISON


W. K. L. Dickson: Edison Kinetoscopic Record of a Sneeze (The Sneeze / Fred Ott’s Sneeze) (Edison, US 1894) Supv: W. K. L. Dickson; ph: William Heise; cast: Frederick Ott; filmed: Black Maria, Orange, NJ, 7 Jan 1894; 35 mm. From: Library of Congress.

W. K. L. DICKSON. A three-part show of ca 90 min curated by Paul Spehr. Viewed at Le Giornate del Cinema Muto, Pordenone, Cinema Verdi, 7 October 2008, e-subtitles in Italian, grand piano: John Sweeney.

Paul Spehr's W. K. L. Dickson show was one show only but incredibly rich, one of the most amazing of the Festival, covering his contributions in inventions from the 1880s until 1899. W.K.L. Dickson's (1860-1935) career as a filmmaker extended over a dozen years, and during that time he made 300-500 films, maybe more. He created production facilities for Edison, then for the American Mutoscope Co., the companies that dominated the American industry before Hollywood. Dickson designed cameras, viewing devices, studios, machines to perforate and trim film, contact printers, developing tanks, drying reels, he trained operators, planned and rehearsed film takes, made copies. In 1897 he went to England, where he set up production for the British Mutoscope Co., which soon added production facilities in France and Germany. By 1898 crews trained in his production system were working in each of these countries. The films he produced were almost universally regarded as the gold standard. These included Biograph's large-format films (called 68mm today), shot at 30-40 fps. Maintaining quality was Dickson's primary concern. Shortly after filming the Boer War in 1899 he retired from filmmaking. (following Paul Spehr's introduction).

Prog. 1 Experimental Films for Edison
Paul Spehr: "Edison envisaged his Kinetograph/Kinetoscope as an adjunct to – or an extension of – his cylinder phonograph.To join the image to his phonograph Dickson, his photographic specialist, was charged with trying to capture images as small as 1/32nd of an inch on a companion cylinder. The available photographic material was ill-suited for the purpose, and the graininess and distortion caused by the curvature of the cylinder made his early tests unacceptable.He persuaded Edison to accept a series of gradual increases in the size of the image. By the time of his final experiments with the cylinder the size of the image had increased to ¼-inch, and the cylinder was becoming too large to synchronize with the phonograph. He was now using the celluloid sheet-film that Carbutt and others began marketing late in 1888, but switched to the celluloid roll-film which Eastman began producing at the end of the summer of 1889." – Paul Spehr

[MONKEYSHINES NO. 1]
(Edison, US 1889) [MONKEYSHINES NO. 2] (Edison, US 1889) Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: Charles Brown?; filmed: (an outdoor photographic shed or photo building, Edison Laboratory, Orange, NJ, 6-7.1889; DVD, 28” + 28” (30? fps); print: Mastered from a photograph, courtesy Charles Musser & Edison National Historic Site,Orange, NJ. Transferred from an 8x10 photograph via computer animation by Bret Wood, KinoVideo. DVD projection by courtesy of MoMA / Donald Krim, Kino Video. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "A photograph of 3 strips of cylinder experiments was sent to the U.S. Patent Office in 1896 to support Edison’s application for a patent for a camera taking moving images. They reproduced images made on sections of celluloid cut from sheets purchased in June 1889. According to Dickson the celluloid was wrapped around the cylinder and exposure was made by light from a Leyden jar. Images from 2 of those strips are reproduced here. They show one of Dickson’s co-workers dressed in white doing “monkeyshines”, i.e., cavorting in front of a dark background. Testifying later, Fred Ott said he posed for such tests, and he may be one of the performers here. Ott and fellow Edison employees said these tests were made prior to August 1889, but film historians, led by Gordon Hendricks, have challenged this. Hendricks opined that Dickson was still working on a cylinder machine as late as 1891, because of a statement by Dickson in his 1933 article in the Journal of the SMPE that Sacco Albanese,who did not work for Edison until 1890, posed for Monkeyshines. There is, however, evidence that the subsequent machine using strips of celluloid fed horizontally was in use early in 1890. The weeks following receipt of the celluloid were an unusually intense period of work, which coincided with a feverish effort by Dickson to purchase the new celluloid roll-film which Eastman announced during this period, July 1889. Finally, a photograph showing the machine that used Eastman’s rolls shows Charles Kayser behind it, and Kayser’s last day of work with the machine was 8 May 1890. This evidence is not conclusive, however, so the debate about this will probably continue. Regardless of the exact date, these are some of the earliest photographs intended to create the illusion of movement." – Paul Spehr

[TEST STRIPS FROM THE HORIZONTAL-FEED STRIP KINETOGRAPH/ KINETOSCOPE: DICKSON GREETING; NEWARK ATHLETE/INDIAN CLUB SWINGER; MEN BOXING]
(Edison, US, 1890-91). Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: William Heise; filmed: photo building or outside photo shed, Edison Laboratory, Orange, NJ, primavera/Spring 1891; DVD (from 35mm), 55” (30 fps); source: LoC. DVD projection by courtesy of The Museum of Modern Art, New York. Video transfer made by the Motion Picture Conservation Center, Library of Congress, Culpeper,Virginia. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "On 20 May 1891, an image ofW.K.L.Dickson gesturing to the camera with a straw hat in hand was shown to delegates from theWomen’s Clubs of America on a prototype Kinetoscope at Edison’s Laboratory following their luncheon at Edison’s home, Glenmont.This was one of several tests made during 1891, and strips cut from three – Dickson’s greeting, an athlete swinging Indian clubs, and men boxing – which survived in a notebook kept by Edison’s close associate Charles Batchelor, are reproduced here. The images were circular, about ¾-inch in diameter, and the film, which was perforated, ran horizontally through the camera.They are short – only 13 or 14 images – so the action is brief and fragmentary. Dickson was not satisfied with the quality of these films, and in the fall of 1891 he made the image a rectangle 1-inch wide by ¾-inch high, and changed the orientation of the film so it moved vertically.To steady the film he added a second row of larger rectangular perforations, 4 to each frame. The result was the format we call 35mm." – Paul Spehr

BLACKSMITHING SCENE
(Edison, US 1893). Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: William Heise; filmed: Black Maria, Orange, NJ, late April or early May 1893; 35mm, 42 ft., 36” (24 fps); print: The Museum of Modern Art, New York. From the collections of Henry Ford Museum and Greenfield Village, Dearborn, Michigan. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "This small piece of working life features Edison employees.A smith and two helpers at work are encouraged by a bottle that they pass around.The film, made in the Black Maria studio in late April or early May 1893, was shown at a demonstration for the Department of Physics at the Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences onTuesday, 9 May 1893. It was the first demonstration of the Kinetoscope outside the Edison Laboratory." – Paul Spehr

EDISON KINETOSCOPIC RECORD OF A SNEEZE (The Sneeze / Fred Ott’s Sneeze) (Edison, US 1894) Supv: W.K.L. Dickson; ph: William Heise; cast: Frederick Ott; filmed: Black Maria, Orange, NJ, 7.1.1894; 35 mm, 10 ft., 9” (18 fps); print: LoC. No intertitles. Paul Spehr: "A publicity film made at the request of Barnet Phillips, a writer preparing an article for Harper’s Weekly. Fred Ott took snuff, sneezed, and gained a degree of immortality. Although the film only had limited showings, it is perhaps the best-known film made for the Kinetoscope. Barnet Phillips’ article, “The Record of a Sneeze”, appeared in the 24 March 1894 issue of Harper’s Weekly.The account of the Fred Ott film in Dickson’s History of the Kinetograph, Kinetoscope and Kineto-Phonograph (1895) says that despite taking snuff twice, and breathing pepper, Fred Ott could not sneeze, so the filming was postponed to the next day, when it was finally successful, so this seems to be the first recorded re-take." – Paul Spehr

The Drums of Love

Kahden veljen rakkaus. US 1928. PC: United Artists. P+D: D.W. Griffith. SC: Gerrit J. Lloyd.DP: G.W. Bitzer, Harry Jackson, Karl Struss. AD: William Cameron Menzies, cast: Mary Philbin (Emanuella), Lionel Barrymore (Duke Cathos de Alvia), Don Alvarado (Count Leonardo de Alvia), Tully Marshall (Bopi), William Austin (Raymond of Boston), Eugenie Besserer (Duchess de Alvia), Charles Hill Mailes (Duke de Granada); 16mm, 3318 ft /20 fps/ 111 min [including alternate ending 178 ft /20 fps/ 6 min]; print: LoC, original in English with e-subtitles in Italian, grand piano: Gabriel Thibaudeau. Viewed at Le Giornate del Cinema Muto, Pordenone, Ridotto dal Verdi, 7 October 2008. - A bad 16mm print, I watched just a sample. - Scott Simmon: "From the time of his first Biograph films, D.W. Griffith was always seducible by solemn “art”. Presented with art director William Cameron Menzies (...) and cinematographer Karl Struss (...), Griffith came up with a story inspired by doomed lovers Paolo and Francesca for a film that is beautifully crafted but off-balance in structure and slow in pace. Variety’s positive review (“a sweet comeback for Griffith”) nevertheless recognized that it would be a hard sell to the mass audience: “Drums of Love is a loge section film. The art centers will love it. That’s sure. Its basic appeal is to the playgoer who thoroughly enjoys the Theatre Guild.” The most telling initial notice was from the New York Telegram: “Reviewing a Griffith picture is like nothing else in the experience of an American picture fan. For, after all, D.W. has been our first and foremost, our best beloved, our pet genius whom we could always count on when the great lords from overseas – the Murnaus, the Lubitsches and the Stillers – arrived with their great bag of tricks to show us how it is done. And that’s why it’s so tarnation sad when the Grand Old Man turns out a Drums of Love.”
Were it not such an extraordinarily dark tale, it would be easier to see this strangely titled film (“drums” of love are nowhere to be found in it) as Griffith’s first “Hollywood” movie. When he had last directed in Los Angeles in 1919, he had still been his own producer. Now he was back with an excellent employee’s contract for what turned out to be the first of four features produced by Joseph Schenck (initially at his appealingly named Art Cinema Corporation) for release through United Artists, of which Schenck was also president. These films would essentially put an end to Griffith’s career.
The structure and style of The Drums of Love are unconventional, and not without interest. After a static scene of the Alvia brothers swearing eternal love for each other at their father’s deathbed, shot with Karl Struss’ recognizably misty diffusion, the perspective switches to a sequence more characteristic of Griffith. The brothers lead troops to victory in a large-scale battle against the Duke of Granada’s forces. It’s the sort of scene, however, that would usually climax a Griffith film, and here it’s tossed off perfunctorily. Most of the rest of the film will rely for spectacle on unconvincing glass-shot effects. Unusual for Griffith too is the fluid mobility of the camera in early scenes, especially of carefree Emanuella at her father’s home. The tone of the rest of the film seems also to weigh down the camera.
The performances are so varied in expressiveness as to lead to a disastrous imbalance in the film as a whole. Top-billed was Mary Philbin, a pleasant-enough actress who was developing an odd career repeatedly playing the lovely consort of deeply deformed but good-hearted men (...) Dolled up in a Goldilocks wig and “recently home from the convent”, she is here paired with Don Alvarado, one of the low-rent Latin Lover replacements after Valentino’s death. His acting range appears so extremely limited that, by the climax of The Drums of Love, his character’s passion and guilt register as a Kuleshov test – an identical expression distinguished only by whether it is edited next to Emanuella or a portrait of his brother: “Sometimes there is a lethargy about his actions,” in the New York Times’s understatement. The human interest in the film arises from the convincing and even endearing performance of Lionel Barrymore as Duke Cathos; it was “this actor’s outstanding camera achievement to date,” in Variety’s verdict. When Emanuella first sees Cathos, he’s shadowed in Expressionist darkness that emphasizes his heavy brow, broad mustache, and hairy hands, but he’s also immediately rather winning in mocking his own hump and letting her know that she’s quite free to withdraw from the marriage “and none will be the worse”. (It’s her father who again forces the union.) Barrymore provides the rare flashes of wit in a film too weighed down by intertitles penned by Griffith with his former publicist Gerrit J. Lloyd; “it would … have been far more satisfactory to include in the captions phrases that were less hard and contained an element of charm,” noted the New York Times. As the un-comic jester, Tully Marshall skulks around melodramatically, as if testing out the character he will use to drool on Gloria Swanson later that year in Erich von Stroheim’s Queen Kelly (1928). It becomes evident that Griffith’s rooting interest in all this court intrigue is entirely with Barrymore’s sad, lonely, deformed duke, and we too become increasingly impatient with pampered Emanuella for preferring the dim, handsome brother. The Drums of Love comes close to being a fascinating film – if we weren’t forced to spend so much time with the two lovers.
The difficulty that Griffith and Schenck had in marketing the film is evident in the survival of two different last reels. The plot description above recounts the film’s original story as seen at the Los Angeles and New York premieres. After Cathos is informed by the jester of the liaison between his brother and his wife, they enact a long, heavy finale of guilt, honor, sacrifice, and murder. Emanuella declares “I must die”. Cathos kisses and stabs her, then even more regretfully must stab his brother: “Death before a stain on our honor.” Anticipating another Lionel Barrymore film, Duel in the Sun (...), the two dying lovers crawl toward each other, even while they beg Cathos’ forgiveness, and Struss’ photography gets even mistier. In a strikingly composed and dark coda, Cathos kisses the hands of the two bodies on a bier and walks slowly off, tormented and more hunched than ever. “The closing incident” might be a problem, the New York Times hinted. Variety elaborated that “doubts have been expressed as to whether the beauty values here can overcome the tragic double killing at the finish,” but noted that “Greta [Garbo] passes on in both Flesh and the Devil and Love …”. However, MGM had come around to revising the end of Love (Edmund Goulding, 1927) – an adaptation of Anna Karenina – so that Anna and Vronsky live happily ever after, a version released widely earlier in January 1928. Griffith and Schenck apparently decided to try the same thing. In the revised final reel of The Drums of Love put into general release by late February 1928, the brothers again fight and Emanuella again recognizes “I must die”. However, this time Cathos stabs the ever-intrusive jester, and is mortally wounded in return. There is no record that the revised ending improved the film’s box-office appeal.
" – Scott Simmon [DWG Project # 618]. - With a film interesting mostly because of its beauty values, it was a pity that only such a bad 16mm print was available. I did not stay and am looking forward to a good print!

Kleider machen Leute / L'Habit ne fait pas le moine (2008 restoration by Cinémathèque Royale de Belgique in cooperation with Bundesarchiv-Filmarchiv)


Hans Steinhoff: Kleider machen Leute (AT 1921). Hermann Thimig (Jaro).

Kleider machen Leute / Bräutigam auf Kredit – version francaise: L'Habit ne fait pas le moine. 
     AT 1921. PC: Volo-Film. D+SC: Hans Steinhoff – based on the short story “Kleider machen Leute” by Gottfried Keller (1874); intertitles: Homunculus [Robert Weil]; DP: Anton Pucher, Herr Kieselau; AD: Hans Neumann (interiors), Hans Dostal, Robert Reich; COST: Karl Alexander Wilke; art titles + trick images: Mayblond [Michael Maybaum]; 
    CAST: Hermann Thimig (Jaro/Jago Strapinsky), Dora Kaiser (Nettchen/Dora, Judge Polski’s daughter), Hugo Thimig (Landlord of the “Golden Scales” Inn /“Hotel Wasily”), Thea Oesy (Erika), Wilhelm Schmidt (Melchior Böhnli/Bonislas), Franz Kammauf (Judge Polski), Cornelius Kirschner (Vicar), Eugen Günther (Pharmacist), Fritz Straßny (Professor), Josef Moser (Notary), Viktor Kutschera (Beggar), Hans Thimig (Fool); 
    orig. l: 1893 m; restored French version: 1675 m /18 fps/ 81 min (Desmet colour, duplicating original tinting and toning); print: Cinémathèque Royale de Belgique. Restored by Cinémathèque Royale de Belgique, Bruxelles, in cooperation with Bundesarchiv-Filmarchiv, Berlin. 
    French intertitles with e-subtitles in English and Italian, grand piano: Günter A. Buchwald. 
    Viewed at Le Giornate del Cinema Muto, Pordenone, Cinema Verdi, 7 October 2008.

(When there are two character names, e.g., Nettchen/Dora, the first is that of the original German version, the second that of the French version.)

Horst Claus: "Following the screening of the Bundesarchiv-Filmarchiv’s restored prints of Steinhoff’s silent films by the Giornate del Cinema Muto since 2002, the Cinémathèque Royale de Belgique discovered and, in 2005, restored a tinted and toned French version of the director’s debut film, Kleider machen Leute, entitled L’Habit ne fait pas le moine (the French proverbial equivalent of the original German title). A comparison of this print’s second reel with its – up to now – only surviving German counterpart (shown at the Giornate in 2004) indicates that both are based on the same materials. In both cases the plot-line adheres closely to Gottfried Keller's original short story (first published in 1874), which relates events surrounding the penniless tailor Jaro (French version: Jago) Strapinsky, who recently has lost his job. Dressed in his best clothes while looking for new employment, he is picked up by the coachman of a Count’s carriage, who – after dropping him off in Goldach – makes the greedy landlord of the town’s hotel believe that his passenger is a wealthy and important melancholy aristocrat. The news of the mysterious stranger’s arrival spreads like wildfire among the town’s citizens, who hope to benefit financially or socially by being associated with the supposedly high-ranking personage. Their attention, combined with their eagerness to shower him with credit he has not asked for, make it impossible for Jaro either to get away secretly or reveal his true identity – with embarrassing as well as happy consequences for both sides."

"Shot mainly on location in the Vienna Woods between June and August 1921, the film was made by Steinhoff’s own Vienna-based production company Volo-Film. Besides producing and directing it, Steinhoff also wrote the scenario and supplied the ideas for the extensive designs of the intertitles. Acquired by Hanns Lippmann’s Gloria-Filmgesellschaft (a subsidiary of Ufa), Kleider machen Leute premiered to unanimous critical acclaim at the end of 1921 in Berlin, as Bräutigam auf Kredit (“Groom Through Credit”, a title which Ufa’s publicity department considered had stronger audience appeal than the original). Though a financial flop, it paved the way for Steinhoff's entry into the German film industry. It also was the reason why, for a number of years, several critics regarded him as one of the most promising film directors of the time (some even saw in him a potential successor to Ernst Lubitsch)."

"Compared with the Berlin censorship card, which contains a list of the German intertitles, the surviving French print is 214 metres (11%, or approximately 10 minutes) shorter than the German release print. Due to deterioration of the film stock there are gaps at the beginning of Reel 3, when the citizens of Goldach try to curry favour with Jaro/Jago. Further visual material is missing in Reel 4, when Boehnli (French version: Bonislas) plans his intrigue against Jaro/Jago, by inviting the Tailors Guild to perform a pantomime that will ridicule and expose his rival for the love of Nettchen (French version: Dora), the daughter of Goldach’s highest civil servant. Wear and tear are responsible for lost material at the start and end of some of the reels – most prominently at the end of the film, which apparently did not conclude with the couple’s wedding, but continued with a summary of Jaro’s private and business development, culminating in a sequence in which Jaro/Jago and Nettchen/Dora are seen in old age, surrounded by grandchildren. There is some evidence of deliberate attempts to speed up the action by cutting or shortening shots designed to support character development and the creation of atmosphere. Visually, for example, the original opening sequence seems to have placed a far greater emphasis on Jaro/Jago’s pride in his outer appearance. Interference of this kind stands in contrast to the addition of (in most cases unnecessary) explanatory intertitles to the French version. (The first reel alone, with 42 intertitles, contains twice as many textual interruptions than the German print.) Instead of simply replacing the humorous rhyming couplets of the original with their French translations, those responsible for the French print (in line with the film’s subtitle “Comédie sentimentale en 5 Parties”) made do with prose titles that add a sentimental touch to the narrative. Furthermore, their attempt to hide the production’s German provenance by claiming in the opening credits that it is of Polish origin, and performed by renowned artists from the Warsaw People’s Theatre (“Interprétée par les réputés artistes du Théâtre Populaire de Varsovie”), reflects the impact of anti-German sentiment on the international distribution of German-language films in the years following World War I. Though made in Austria and featuring three members of the renowned Austrian acting dynasty of the Thimig family, it purports to be set in Poland, reflecting that country’s comic mores and manners. (“Cette Comédie, qui se déroule en Pologne, n’est qu’une trés humaine étude de moeurs où a été respecté tout ce qui fait le charme des traditions de ce pays.”) Among the curiosities that crept into the film during its conversion from an Austrian to a Polish production for French audiences, today’s spectators will also be intrigued to note that the good people of Goldach, whom the film presents as living in the Biedermeier period, roughly the first half of the 19th Century, already went to the cinema several decades before the medium had officially been invented:“Tous les soirs, comme d’autres vont au Théâtre ou au Cinéma, l’aristocratie du village se réunit à l’Hôtel Wasily.”
– Horst Claus.

A soft duped look in the print. It is nice to see Hermann Thimig, the Lubitsch favourite (Die Puppe) in this role. I watched only the beginning. There is something Gogolian (The Inspector-General) in this Gottfried Keller story.

Monday, October 06, 2008

Potselui Meri Pikford / The Kiss of Mary Pickford


Sergei Komarov: Поцелуй Мэри Пикфорд / Potselui Meri Pikford / The Kiss of Mary Pickford (SU 1926). Anel Sudakevich (Dusia Galkina), Igor Ilinsky (Goga Palkin). Poster design: Semyon Semyonov.

Поцелуй Мэри Пикфорд
    SU 1926. PC: Mezhrabpom-Rus / Sovkino. D: Sergei Komarov; SC: Sergei Komarov, Vadim Shershenevich; DP: Y. Alexeiev; AD: S. Kozlovsky, D. Kolupaev; AN: Y. Merkulov; cast: Igor Ilinsky (Goga Palkin), Anel Sudakevich (Dusia Galkina), Mary Pickford (herself), Douglas Fairbanks (himself), Vera Malinovskaya, Nikolai Rogozhin, M. Rosenstein, Abram Room, M. Rosenberg, N. Sisova, Y. Lenz, A. Glinsky.
    Orig. l: 1715 m /20 fps/ 68 min
    Print: La Cineteca del Friuli (Fondo Gastone Predieri), duration of screening 60 min, Ukrainian intertitles with e-subtitles in English and Italian, grand piano: Günter A. Buchwald.
    Viewed at Le Giornate del Cinema Muto, Pordenone, Cinema Verdi, 6 October 2008.

The print of this Ukrainian version is not very good, with a duped look.

David Robinson (GCM 2008): "A month after the premiere of Sparrows, Mary Pickford and Douglas Fairbanks took off for a European holiday, and on 20 July 1926 arrived in Moscow. At Yartsevo, 330 versts from their destination, the train was stopped to allow a press conference. From the moment of their arrival, they were constantly mobbed by vast, adoring crowds. The suggestion by some writers that there was a foredoomed official attempt to achieve a news blackout on the visit seems unfounded. In fact, in the wake of the New Economic Policy it was a moment when tourism to the USSR was being actively encouraged. Doug and Mary proved ideal Western tourists, and were publicized as such. An autograph was inscribed, “We are delighted with the wholehearted reception accorded us – charmed with enthusiasm of the Russians – truly a great people”. They voiced their enthusiasm for the new Soviet wonder film, The Battleship Potemkin (Bronenosets Potyomkin), told interviewers how much they admired Lenin, and said that their strongest desire was to meet Trotsky."

"Inevitably they were invited to visit the Mezhrabpom-Rus studios. At that moment Miss Mend (Miss Mend) was almost certainly still in production, which would explain the presence in the studio of Sergei Komarov and Igor Ilinsky, who both have prominent roles in Otsep’s film (completed and released in three parts in October 1926). The two seized the opportunity offered by the ceremonial visit of the American stars. Myth has it that Komarov posed as a newsreel cameraman, which is possible, though in any event it would not have been too difficult to arrange the crucial shot of Pickford bestowing a kiss on Ilinsky. Ilinsky (1901-1987) had leapt to national popularity as Petya Petelkin, the lottery-winning hero of Yakov Protazanov’s comedy The Tailor from Torzhok (...), and would certainly have been presented to Pickford as a rising young star, so that a kiss and a camera record of it were easy to arrange as a publicity shot. In the course of the next year, Komarov and his co-scenarist Vadim Shershenevich concocted a story to build around both the kiss and actuality material of the adoring crowds in the streets of Moscow."

"The plot they came up with casts Ilinsky as Goga Palkin, the ticket-taker in a movie theatre. Goga is in love with Dusia, but she dreams only of film stars, and tells him that she will only reciprocate his love if he becomes famous. He gets into the film studio, and after a variety of adventures is involved in a stunt which requires his being hung from the studio ceiling. But in the excitement of the arrival of Doug and Mary, everyone rushes out, forgetting Goga’s plight. When the visitors come into the studio however, they notice him above them: Mary decides he is the new Harry Piel, and rewards him with a kiss. Now at last he is famous, and Dusia gives him her hand. The satirical edge in the depiction of Hollywood style and the follies of fan-worship is softened by amiable envy."

"Goga is the kind of clumsy hero which brought Ilinsky great popularity. Primarily a stage actor, Ilinsky worked from 1920 to 1934 with Vsevolod Meyerhold. His intermittent film appearances began auspiciously with Aelita (1924), and subsequently included The Doll with Millions (Kukla s millionami, 1928), the only other film directed by Komarov (...) Komarov (1891-1957) was a favourite actor of Kuleshov, Pudovkin, and Barnet, with one or other of whom most of his films were made up to the mid-1940s. (...)" – David Robinson.

AA: Soviet comedy revisited: a charming little film with funny clowning, I seem to remember having seen a better print from Gosfilmofond in the 1980s.